A re-blog on Australia and its failing education system

Six ways Australia’s education system is failing our kids

March 16, 2015 6.26am AEDT


Declining test scores, dwindling participation in maths and science, and too few in early learning: just three of the ways Australia is failing in education. AAP

Amid debates about budget cuts and the rising costs of schools and degrees, there is one debate receiving alarmingly little attention in Australia. We’re facing a slow decline in most educational standards, and few are aware just how bad the situation is getting.

These are just six of the ways that Australia’s education system is seriously failing our kids.

1. Australian teens are falling behind, as others race ahead

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) survey tests the skills and knowledge of 15-year-old students in more than 70 economies worldwide. And it shows that Australian 15-year-olds’ scores on reading, maths and scientific literacy have recorded statistically significant declines since 2000, while other countries have shown improvement.

Although there has been much media attention on falling international ranks, it is actually this decline in real scores that should hit the headlines. That’s because it means that students in 2000 answered substantially more questions correctly than students in 2012. The decline is equivalent to more than half a year of schooling.

Our students are falling behind: three years behind students from Shanghai in maths and 1½ years behind in reading.

In maths and science, an average Australian 15-year-old student has the problem-solving abilities equivalent to an average 12-year-old Korean pupil.

An international assessment of school years 4 and 8 shows that Australian students’ average performance is now below that of England and the USA: countries that we used to classify as educationally inferior.

The declining education standards are across all ability levels. Analysis of PISA and NAPLAN suggests that stagnation and decline are occurring among high performing students as well as low performers.

2. Declining participation in science and maths

It has been estimated that 75% of the fastest growing occupations require science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) skills and knowledge.

The importance of STEM is acknowledged by industry and business. Yet there are national declines in Australian participation and attainment in these subjects. We are also among the bottom of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) 34 nations on translation of education investment to innovation, which is highly dependent upon STEM.

Fewer than one in ten Australian students studied advanced maths in year 12 in 2013. In particular, there has been a collapse in girls studying maths and science.

A national gender breakdown shows that just 6.6% of girls sat for advanced mathematics in 2013; that’s half the rate for boys, and represents a 23% decline since 2004. In New South Wales, a tiny 1.5% of girls take the trio of advanced maths, physics and chemistry.

Maths is not a requirement at senior secondary level in NSW, Victoria and Western Australia, although it is compulsory in South Australia, and to a small extent in Queensland and the Northern Territory. In NSW, the requirement for Higher School Certificate (HSC) maths or science study was removed in 2001. The national curriculum also makes no requirement for maths or science study after Year 10.

Australia is just about the only developed nation that does not make it compulsory to study maths in order to graduate from high school.

recent report by the Productivity Commission found almost one-quarter of Australians are capable of only basic mathematics, such as counting. Many universities now have to offer basic (school level) maths and literacy development courses to support students in their study. These outcomes look extremely concerning when we review participation and achievement in maths and science internationally.

3. Australian education is monolingual

In 2013, the proportion of students studying a foreign language is at historic lows. For example in NSW, only 8% studied a foreign language for their HSC, the lowest percentage ever recorded.

In NSW, the number of HSC students studying Chinese in 2014 was just 798 (635 of which were students with a Chinese background), whereas a decade ago it was almost double that number, with 1,591.

The most popular beginner language in NSW was French, with 663 HSC students taking French as a beginner in 2013. These numbers are extremely small when you consider that the total number of HSC students in NSW: more than 75,000.

These declines, which are typical of what has happened around the country, have occurred at a time when most other industrialised countries have been strengthening their students’ knowledge of other cultures and languages, in particular learning English.

English language skills are becoming a basic skill around the world. Monolingual Australians are increasingly competing for jobs with people who are just as competent in English as they are in their own native language – and possibly one or two more.

4. International and migrant students are actually raising standards, not lowering them

There are many who believe that Australian education is being held back by our multicultural composition and high proportion of migrant students. This could not be further from the truth. In the most recent PISA assessment of 15 year olds, Australian-born students’ average English literacy score was significantly lower than the average first-generation migrant students’ score, and not significantly different from foreign-born students.

The proportion of top performers was higher for foreign-born (14%) and first-generation students (15%) than for Australian-born students (10%).

Students from Chinese, Korean and Sri Lankan backgrounds are the highest performers in the NSW HSC. The top performing selective secondary schools in NSW now have more than 80% of students coming from non-English speaking backgrounds.

5. You can’t have quality education without quality teachers

While there are many factors that may contribute to teacher quality, the overall academic attainment of those entering teaching degrees is an obvious and measurable component, which has been the focus of rigorous standards in many countries.

An international benchmarking study indicates that Australia’s teacher education policies are currently falling well short of high-achieving countries where future teachers are recruited from the top 30% of the age cohort.

In Australia between 1983 and 2003, the standard intake was from the top 26% to 39%. By 2012/2013, less than half of Year 12 students receiving offers for places in undergraduate teacher education courses had ATAR scores in the top 50% of their age cohort.

Teacher education degrees also had the highest percentage of students entering with low ATAR scores, and the proportion of teacher education entrants with an ATAR of less than 50 nearly doubled over the past three years. We cannot expect above-average education with below-average teachers.

6. Early learning participation is amongst the lowest in the developed world

While Australia has recently lifted levels of investment in early childhood education, this investment has not been reflected in high levels of early childhood participation. In Australia, just 18% of 3 year olds participated in early childhood education, compared with 70% on average across the OECD. In this respect, we rank at 34 out of 36 OECD and partner countries.

Australia also ranks at 22 out of 37 on the OECD league table that measures the total investment across education as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product.

While low levels of expenditure and participation curtail any system, there is more negative impact from a lack of investment in early childhood than there would be from a lack of funding further up the educational chain. Nobel prize winner James Heckmann has shown how investment in early childhood produces the greatest returns to society.

What to do?

Funding is a critical issue, and not just in terms of what you spend, but also how you spend it. Research suggests spending on early childhood, quality teaching and core curriculum have the greatest returns on investment.

There is also growing evidence to suggest that a segregated schooling system – for example, socio-economically oracademically selective schools – is counterproductive and restricts social mobility. High-performing countries have school systems on a far more level playing field than Australia.

We need a long-term plan across education sectors: from early childhood, to schools, universities and TAFE, which includes plans for supporting and strengthening teacher education in all those sectors.

We also need a louder public conversation about Australian education, and lobbying to shift how we value and invest in education.

When Germany was shocked by its first performance on the 2000 PISA assessment, it started a national conversation that saw education on the front page of newspapers for the next two years. Germany’s education has been improving ever since.

If Australia wants to build a strong and competitive economy, we need fewer front page articles about budget cuts, and more on reform and investment in education.

70Comments
  1. Alan Baxter

    Head, Department of Molecular & Cell Biology at James Cook University

    I think we have to be honest here. Australia has a great tradition of a sporting culture, and in (for example) football, if someone plays very well (for example, Peter Hudson, full back for Hawthorne in the 70’s), you kick the shit out of them.

    1. Kathryn Cole 

      Kathryn Cole is a Friend of The Conversation

      Humanager

      In reply to Alan Baxter

      Anti-intellectualism and the tall poppy syndrome are definitely factors. I also believe we don’t pay our teachers enough money or respect. Teaching is a highly influential profession within society – teachers engage with our children for 30 of their most receptive hours a week. We want the brightest, most creative and emotionally intelligent people in these jobs. And in many cases we already have them. However, we will need to pay them much more to tip all viable candidates into the teaching pool and to communicate our respect for their capability and dedication.

Sent from Samsung tablet

Tags: , , ,

9 Responses to “A re-blog on Australia and its failing education system”

  1. nonsmokingladybug Says:

    It can’t be a bigger mess than our education system. We have the “don’t leave a kid behind policy”. Meaning no kid can fail..or make the whole chain as weak as the weakest link.

    We have substistute teachers in our schools and pretty much everybody can become one. No special education required. Just go in and teach.

    Then we have home schooling. Parents teaching their kids at home whatever they think they know and I am not talking about people living on farms far away, no they do that everywhere, so that the kids don’t have to deal with “ugly” things in school.

    It’s a mess, a total mess.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. algernon1 Says:

    Gerard, I think there is an overemphasis on results rather than outcomes. Sure a Korean child might be three years in advance of their Australian counterpart in a particular subject. Bur what about their ability in say critical thinking, common sense, being able to interact with their colleagues. I’ve seen enough of them who are churned through these education factories. They can’t deal with the day to day.

    The question of ATAR is interesting too. Its a rank one that is manipulated by the universities. Bonus marks for living somewhere. Getting a particular band in a certain subject, discretion of the dean to give marks on top. Just to fill a quota of students. A student can end up with an ATAR which is lower, in some cases far lower than the cut off and still get into a course.

    Then there’s the grading of some subjects. Science for example will see an HSC scale higher than a Fine Art subject or Music which will be scaled lower. Yet I’d argue that the Art or Music subject has more rigour than the science subject.

    At the end of the day our education system should be producing good all rounders capable of performing every day tasks rather than sausage factory academics who can’t perform the simplest of tasks. People who enjoy what they are doing rather than be seen as failures for not becoming Doctors or Lawyers or the prestige of these professions.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. auntyuta Says:

    I would think that “sausage factory academics” is definitely not we should be aiming for.
    ” . . . producing good all rounders capable of performing every day tasks . . . ” Yes, this sounds good to me!🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • gerard oosterman Says:

      Yes, but are sausage factory academics produced anywhere? We had Korean students with us while living in Balmain. I did not get the impression they were sausage produced at all.

      I do think that bilingual language teaching in education ought to be the norm.

      Liked by 1 person

      • algernon1 Says:

        I don’t think I suggested that the Koreans were sausage factory produced. However I’ve seen plenty of examples of kids who go to school then straight to coaching. On weekends are off to weekend coaching. The can’t relate to everyday people. Predominately Asian kids. Employed a Chinese guy who’s parents thought he was a failure because he wasn’t a Lawyer like his siblings. Yet he loved what he was doing and was good at it.

        I’d like to see needs based education and a stop of the subsidising of private education companies. Not a chance with our current government.

        Liked by 2 people

      • gerard oosterman Says:

        Oh, stopping subsidising private education has my support totally.
        If ever, sausages educational products are produced in those institutions as nowhere else.
        All future monarchists and Abbott lovers.

        Liked by 2 people

  4. Master of Something Yet Says:

    The teacher quality thing is a major issue. When my nephew was studying, he had cohorts who failed the sample primary school maths tests. Failed! How do you teach something you can’t even do yourself? But even when we do get good teachers out there, they’re not supported. My nephew (a very intelligent maths and science focussed young man) lasted a year and then gave up teaching. The whole thing is a mess.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: